Voici les éléments 1 - 3 sur 3
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    Shakespeare in the Wake of the Exclusion Crisis, 1683-1700
    (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)
    Shakespeare's rise to prominence was by no means inevitable. While he was popular in his lifetime, the number of new editions and revivals of his plays declined over the following decades. Emma Depledge uses the methodologies of book and theatre history to provide a re-assessment of the reputation and dissemination of Shakespeare during the Interregnum and Restoration. She demonstrates the crucial role of the Exclusion Crisis (1678–1682), a political crisis over the royal succession, as a foundational moment in Shakespeare's canonisation. The period saw a sudden surge of theatrical alterations and a significantly increased rate of new editions and stage revivals. In the wake of the Exclusion Crisis, Shakespeare's plays were made available on a scale not witnessed since the early seventeenth century, thus reversing what might otherwise have been a permanent disappearance of his drama from canonical familiarity and firmly establishing Shakespeare's work in the national cultural imagination.
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    The Politics of Rape in Nahum Tate's The History of King Lear, 1681
    (Washington DC: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Group, 2014) ;
    Höfele, Andreas
    ;
    Dobson, Michael
    ;
    Procházka, Martin
    ;
    Scolnicov, Hanna
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    Shakespeare alterations of the exclusion crisis, 1678-1682: politics, rape, and authorship
    (Geneva, 2012)
    This thesis explores Shakespeare's Restoration afterlife, claiming that a succession dispute known as the Exclusion Crisis (1678-1682) helped to rescue his plays from obscurity. In addition to exploring what the Crisis can tell us about Shakespeare's authorial afterlife the thesis contends that the ten Shakespeare alterations produced between 1678 and 1682 provide insights not only into the politics of the period, but more specifically into the problematic implications of the ‘rape rhetoric' circulating in the late 1670s and early 1680s.